gnewsense-dev
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Gnewsense-dev] Hispano Forum on main Site


From: Paul O'Malley - gnu's not unix -
Subject: Re: [Gnewsense-dev] Hispano Forum on main Site
Date: Sat, 16 May 2009 16:05:28 +0100
User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (X11/20090318)

Ted Smith wrote:

Hi Ted & All,

Where is the person who has shown the following qualities:

(A) a duration of support for the project, and shown to have similar aims.

(B) a level of technical skill suitable for running this aspect of the project, some of which are to be seen in (i) and (ii) **
(i)Where is the person to make web to forums and forums to web work?

large typo on my part clarified in my addendum I hope ;-)

mail to forums and
forums to mail


Could you clarify what you mean by "web"?
as above ;-)

(ii) Where is the person to stop spam on such forums?

There's a large amount of anti-spam work for phpBB, a very widely-used
(and free) forum program.

(C) (this is the hard part,) have the trust of the FSF to work on the hardware they donate to the project

However if you (A) and (B) then perhaps (C) is not that hard.

** Proof of such an ability needs to be shown in advance because once the move is made it is very hard to say we are unhooking these technologies, thus it needs to be done right the first time to grow rather than break the project.
In my mind these conditions have not been fulfilled.

Any Takers?

I have not been very visible (if at all) in the gNewSense community, so
I don't know if I have the trust needed, nor do I know if I have the
technical skill (wrt "forums to web"). I'd gladly moderate a gNewSense
forum, and that is not something which requires large amounts of trust
(as moderators can be easily replaced) or skill.
Who would do the implementation, i.e. porting our existing knowledge to a new format, or should we not try to merge but just populate something new?

As we have grown and we have amassed a lot of information, in consideration of this, there is a transition process to be under taken, there is an overhead in that process.

Part of this process is we do with the existing web site.

http://www.gnewsense.org
http://wiki.gnewsense.org/ForumMain/ForumMain,

do we split it out into this?

http://www.gnewsense.org

http://wiki.gnewsense.org

http://forums.gnewsense.org

However the URLs are worked out I use the different names to show different focus.

Again I ask, any takers, this is not a yes you can do it.

This is a show us you have a plan, and the ability to implement it.
This is prove to us that the consequences of doing what is proposed are manageable or at the very least what the project impact is.

For instance, as a result of this move do we face orphaned information, what is the policy to be for this information? For instance if there is good information there do we have a rescue method available.

As an aside perhaps it is worthy of note that we did not know a lot about what we wanted when we started out, what our original design goal was, is really this simple, do something that does not require a full time management effort, there are more important freedom issues to be dealt with.

We (Brian and I), both objected to moving to a different wiki toolset on the grounds that neither of us wanted to have to spend our time patching the various wikis out there which seemed (three years ago) to have a lot of exploits.

We wanted something that was very simple, to work with, and keep up to date.

Regards,

Paul




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]