[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Gnu-arch-users] Re: Utterly painless arch?
From: |
Neil Stevens |
Subject: |
[Gnu-arch-users] Re: Utterly painless arch? |
Date: |
Tue, 9 Sep 2003 20:38:23 -0700 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.5.3 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Tuesday September 09, 2003 9:00 am, Zack Brown wrote:
> The tagging method you talk about is another issue, but less important.
> Default tagging should just be by name, so the user doesn't have to do
> anything. Let the power users choose better tagging systems, and let
> novices have things just work reasonably.
I don't understand. Why would someone be trying arch unless he were
dissatisfied with his current source control and looking for a change?
And if the person is looking for a change, why should the arch defaults be
the same as every other popular control system?
I think the arch default should be tagline, personally. Make it as
painless as possible for people trying to see arch's advantages.
- --
Neil Stevens - address@hidden
"Now and in the future, we will support our troops" -- George Walker Bush
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (FreeBSD)
iD8DBQE/Xpyvf7mnligQOmERAnpsAKCISNIBlPFKBrvksPvmjYkmRQSpNwCgktwa
BQaEFZpc0qLk66UJZTPH+98=
=0NnO
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Utterly painless arch?, (continued)
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Utterly painless arch?, Adam Spiers, 2003/09/14
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Utterly painless arch?, Bruce Stephens, 2003/09/10
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Utterly painless arch?, Andrew Suffield, 2003/09/10
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Utterly painless arch?, Miles Bader, 2003/09/10
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Utterly painless arch?, John Goerzen, 2003/09/10
[Gnu-arch-users] Re: Utterly painless arch?,
Neil Stevens <=