[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Utterly painless arch?
From: |
David Brown |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Utterly painless arch? |
Date: |
Wed, 10 Sep 2003 11:12:47 -0700 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.4i |
On Wed, Sep 10, 2003 at 06:48:23PM +0100, Andrew Suffield wrote:
> Are there really editors other than elvis and nvi which are confused
> by filenames starting with a + ?
Vim also is "confused". But that isn't the right word. Vi class
editors take the leading plus to have a very specific meaning. Vim does
allow an '--' option which causes the rest to be interpreted as
filenames.
It is ancient behavior, but these editors still support it. Emacs also
parses '+' options, but only if followed by a number. Vi allows a
command there, so any text is parsed.
Don't underestimate the number of people who use vi derrivative editors.
Dave
pgpbkC8NKVzWR.pgp
Description: PGP signature
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Utterly painless arch?, (continued)
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Utterly painless arch?, Miles Bader, 2003/09/10
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Utterly painless arch?, Tez Kamihira, 2003/09/10
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Utterly painless arch?, John Goerzen, 2003/09/10
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Utterly painless arch?, Robert Anderson, 2003/09/10
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Utterly painless arch?, Tobias C. Rittweiler, 2003/09/10
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Utterly painless arch?, Tobias C. Rittweiler, 2003/09/10
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Utterly painless arch?, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2003/09/10
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Utterly painless arch?, Tobias C. Rittweiler, 2003/09/12
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Utterly painless arch?, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2003/09/10
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Utterly painless arch?, Andrew Suffield, 2003/09/10
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Utterly painless arch?, Adam Spiers, 2003/09/14
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Utterly painless arch?, Bruce Stephens, 2003/09/10
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Utterly painless arch?, Andrew Suffield, 2003/09/10
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Utterly painless arch?, Miles Bader, 2003/09/10
[Gnu-arch-users] Re: Utterly painless arch?, John Goerzen, 2003/09/10
[Gnu-arch-users] Re: Utterly painless arch?, Neil Stevens, 2003/09/09