[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] tla1.1 plans
From: |
Robert Collins |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] tla1.1 plans |
Date: |
Tue, 16 Sep 2003 07:56:41 +1000 |
On Tue, 2003-09-16 at 07:53, Tom Lord wrote:
>
> > A java project, that wants to treat .class (.o) files as excluded, but
> > also recieves some .class files from elsewhere to link into jars - but
> > without the source. They may even be arbitrarily mixed in amongst the
> > code they have source for, and unable to split them out via configs.
>
> But untagged-source does a pretty good job with that, no? Those class
> files which are tagged are source, those that aren't are something
> else.
Thats one reason I use explicit all the time. Consider a tagline using
tree, where source -> names? (or does untagged-source work there as
well?).
Rob
--
GPG key available at: <http://members.aardvark.net.au/lifeless/keys.txt>.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] tla1.1 plans, (continued)
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] tla1.1 plans, Miles Bader, 2003/09/15
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] tla1.1 plans, Mark A. Flacy, 2003/09/15
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] tla1.1 plans, Robert Collins, 2003/09/15
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] tla1.1 plans, Mark A. Flacy, 2003/09/15
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] tla1.1 plans, Robert Collins, 2003/09/15
[Gnu-arch-users] Re: tla1.1 plans, Miles Bader, 2003/09/15
[Gnu-arch-users] Re: tla1.1 plans, Mark A. Flacy, 2003/09/16
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] tla1.1 plans, Florian Weimer, 2003/09/18
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] tla1.1 plans, Miles Bader, 2003/09/15
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] tla1.1 plans, Miles Bader, 2003/09/15
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] tla1.1 plans, Tom Lord, 2003/09/15