[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] UI change proposal: logs vs. log-ls
From: |
Pau Aliagas |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] UI change proposal: logs vs. log-ls |
Date: |
Fri, 19 Sep 2003 08:57:01 +0200 (CEST) |
On 19 Sep 2003, Miles Bader wrote:
> I find these two command very confusing since the names basically seem
> like variants of the same thing, but their behavior is rather different.
>
> My proposal is to either:
>
> (1) Change `logs' -> `log-versions' (since the current `logs' command
> really returns a list of versions, not logs), and change `log-ls'
> to `logs' (since this command really does return a list of logs).
> (2) Only have one command `logs' which basically does what `log-ls'
> does now, and add a `--versions' option that makes it return a
> list of versions like the current `logs' command does.
When I type tla logs I expect to see the list of logs of the different
branches--versions, as currently happens.
OTOH, log-ls doesn't suggest me anything, I'd rather have "tla patches",
much more natural ans easy to remember. So, what about a tla patches?
We have two commands that operate in a project tree:
-tla branches
-tla versions
So tla patches makes sense to me.
tla categories is a bit inconsistent as it returns the available
categories in the archive, instead of the tree. Maybe now hat we have
abrowse we could recycle it and use it inside a tree to see the
categories, analogously to branches, versions and the proposed patches.
What do you think?
Pau
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: UI change proposal: *-tag -> *->id, (continued)
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: UI change proposal: *-tag -> *->id, Robert Anderson, 2003/09/19
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: UI change proposal: *-tag -> *->id, Zack Brown, 2003/09/19
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: UI change proposal: *-tag -> *->id, Bruce Stephens, 2003/09/19
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: UI change proposal: *-tag -> *->id, Robert Anderson, 2003/09/19
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Re: UI change proposal: *-tag -> *->id, Stig Brautaset, 2003/09/19
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Re: UI change proposal: *-tag -> *->id, Robert Anderson, 2003/09/19
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: UI change proposal: *-tag -> *->id, Tom Lord, 2003/09/19
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: UI change proposal: *-tag -> *->id, Miles Bader, 2003/09/19
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: UI change proposal: *-tag -> *->id, Dustin Sallings, 2003/09/19
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] UI change proposal: *-tag -> *->id, Tom Lord, 2003/09/19
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] UI change proposal: logs vs. log-ls,
Pau Aliagas <=
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: UI change proposal: logs vs. log-ls, Miles Bader, 2003/09/19
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: UI change proposal: logs vs. log-ls, Pau Aliagas, 2003/09/19
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: UI change proposal: logs vs. log-ls, Miles Bader, 2003/09/19
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: UI change proposal: logs vs. log-ls, Pau Aliagas, 2003/09/19
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: UI change proposal: logs vs. log-ls, Miles Bader, 2003/09/19
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: UI change proposal: logs vs. log-ls, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2003/09/19