[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: UI change proposal: *-tag -> *->id
From: |
Robert Anderson |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: UI change proposal: *-tag -> *->id |
Date: |
19 Sep 2003 01:03:55 -0700 |
On Fri, 2003-09-19 at 00:19, Pau Aliagas wrote:
> On 19 Sep 2003, Miles Bader wrote:
>
> > Pau Aliagas <address@hidden> writes:
> > > > In line with the previous discussion, I'd like to following Robert
> > > > Anderson's suggestion and change all the various *-tag commands to be
> > > > *-id (the idea being that the term -tag is easily confused with
> > > > branch-tagging, which seems to be the more widespread use of the term in
> > > > this context):
> > >
> > > Wouldn't it be easier to change tag to branch-tag or version-tag?
> >
> > Tag is a widely used term in general with regard to source-control, with
> > the meaning that the tla `tag' command uses (at the least, it's what CVS
> > uses, and CVS is the big influence on the block).
>
> I have never found confusing the duality of meaning of tag as it refers to
> very different and clerly separated concepts.
So: Why have two words for two concepts when one will do? :)
> In fact, I find its use very
> convinient in both cases as its the exact word that defines what you mean
> to do.
Huh? We could define versions to be called tags and patches to be
called tags and your statement would still be true. So, I don't see
your point.
With the current terminology, I can think of at least 4 meanings for
"tag." I think it's worth renormalizing, myself.
Bob
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] get-patch/show-changeset -> inconsistent or no?, (continued)
- [Gnu-arch-users] UI change proposal: logs vs. log-ls, Miles Bader, 2003/09/18
- [Gnu-arch-users] UI change proposal: *-tag -> *->id, Miles Bader, 2003/09/19
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] UI change proposal: *-tag -> *->id, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2003/09/19
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] UI change proposal: *-tag -> *->id, Pau Aliagas, 2003/09/19
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: UI change proposal: *-tag -> *->id, Miles Bader, 2003/09/19
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: UI change proposal: *-tag -> *->id, Pau Aliagas, 2003/09/19
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: UI change proposal: *-tag -> *->id,
Robert Anderson <=
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: UI change proposal: *-tag -> *->id, Pau Aliagas, 2003/09/19
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: UI change proposal: *-tag -> *->id, Miles Bader, 2003/09/19
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: UI change proposal: *-tag -> *->id, Pau Aliagas, 2003/09/19
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: UI change proposal: *-tag -> *->id, Doran Moppert, 2003/09/19
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: UI change proposal: *-tag -> *->id, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2003/09/19
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: UI change proposal: *-tag -> *->id, Doran Moppert, 2003/09/19
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: UI change proposal: *-tag -> *->id, Miles Bader, 2003/09/21
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: UI change proposal: *-tag -> *->id, Doran Moppert, 2003/09/21
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: UI change proposal: *-tag -> *->id, Miles Bader, 2003/09/21
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: UI change proposal: *-tag -> *->id, Robert Anderson, 2003/09/19