Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: {arch} directory

[Dustin Sallings]

On Friday, Sep 26, 2003, at 22:25 US/Pacific, Robert Anderson wrote:

> >         For example, I use ctags.  One of the projects I imported has a bunch
> > of .c files in the top level directory, and a few in subdirectories.
> > ``ctags -R .'' works fine in CVS.  I'm fine with modifying that to be
> > ``ctags -R *'' since it's roughly about the same to type.  In order to
> > do this with the {arch} directory, I need to do something like ``ctags
> > -R [A-z0-9]*''  Or ``tla inventory --files | ctags -L -''
>
> Note that the presence of pristine trees is orthogonal to the name
> "{arch}".

	Well, * matches {arch}, but does not match .arch, which is my point 
here.

> That being said, what version of ctags are you referring to?  I'm 
> pretty
> sure it's not GNU ctags; your expressions don't "work" in any 
> reasonable
> sense, nor is there a "-L" option.  But I have a comment, depending on
> what you're trying to do with those expressions.

	This is exuberant ctags 5.3 (see ctags.sf.net).  -R is recurse, and -L 
is used to supply a list of source filenames.

--
SPY                      My girlfriend asked me which one I like better.
pub  1024/3CAE01D5 1994/11/03 Dustin Sallings <address@hidden>
|    Key fingerprint =  87 02 57 08 02 D0 DA D6  C8 0F 3E 65 51 98 D8 BE
L_______________________ I hope the answer won't upset her. ____________