[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: arch and linux 2.7
From: |
Stephen J. Turnbull |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: arch and linux 2.7 |
Date: |
Thu, 06 Nov 2003 19:29:22 +0900 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.1002 (Gnus v5.10.2) XEmacs/21.5 (celeriac, linux) |
>>>>> "Tom" == Tom Lord <address@hidden> writes:
> From: "Stephen J. Turnbull" <address@hidden>
> Ie, that people have a lot of hostility toward BK and Larry
> McVoy.
The spirit of the Bitkeeper license is the spirit of the
whip hand. It is the spirit that says, "You have no right
to use Bitkeeper, only temporary privileges that we can
revoke. Be grateful that we allow you to use Bitkeeper. Be
grateful, and don't do anything we dislike, or we may
revoke those privileges." It is the spirit of proprietary
software. Every non-free license is designed to control
the users more or less. Outrage at this spirit is the
reason for the free software movement. (By contrast, the
open source movement prefers to play down this same
outrage.)
--Richard M. Stallman
Tom> Reasonably,
Anyone who deliberately equates intellectual property with slavery has
abandoned reason and embraced demagogery. A slave cannot say "no" to
his owner, no, not even at the cost of substantial inconvenience in
contributing to Linux. He says "no" to his owner at his life's peril.
Do you really not understand the difference between _that_ and a
_software license_?
--
Institute of Policy and Planning Sciences http://turnbull.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp
University of Tsukuba Tennodai 1-1-1 Tsukuba 305-8573 JAPAN
Ask not how you can "do" free software business;
ask what your business can "do for" free software.
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: arch and linux 2.7, (continued)
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: arch and linux 2.7, Paul Hedderly, 2003/11/05
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: arch and linux 2.7, Paul Hedderly, 2003/11/05
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: arch and linux 2.7, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2003/11/05
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: arch and linux 2.7, Mark A. Flacy, 2003/11/05
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: arch and linux 2.7, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2003/11/05
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: arch and linux 2.7, Mark A. Flacy, 2003/11/05
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: arch and linux 2.7, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2003/11/05
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: arch and linux 2.7, Tom Lord, 2003/11/06
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: arch and linux 2.7,
Stephen J. Turnbull <=
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: arch and linux 2.7, John Goerzen, 2003/11/06
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: arch and linux 2.7, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2003/11/06
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: arch and linux 2.7, John Goerzen, 2003/11/07
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: arch and linux 2.7, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2003/11/08
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: arch and linux 2.7, Paul Hedderly, 2003/11/07