[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] unmatched files
From: |
zander |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] unmatched files |
Date: |
Mon, 17 Nov 2003 00:28:28 +0100 |
On Sun, Nov 16, 2003 at 03:26:19PM -0800, Tom Lord wrote:
>
>
> > From: Colin Walters <address@hidden>
>
> > Given that I've explicitly
> > told tla what files are source, why should I have to redundantly
> > classify files via regexp as well?
>
> Because it would have been tactically better for me to release
> (tagless) `inventory' as a separate tool, before arch, touting its
> virtues for purposes such as `make dist' targets.
>
> And then it would just happen to be an external dependency of a
> separately releaseed `mkpatch/dopatch' where tags would be introduced.
>
> And then arch would have been released just as bookkeeping tools for
> those tools.
I simply fail to follow you here, what on earth are you talking about..
I find the issue Colin states very true, its very confusing to see tagging
and regexpes fighting, certainly when its possible to _not_ commit explicitly
added files because your regexpes say they are not elligable (see the
relevant bugreport).
I would appreciate an answer to colin's question that would make me see
your way, so maybe I don't have to curse soo badly the next time this bites
me.
--
Thomas Zander
- [Gnu-arch-users] unmatched files, Colin Walters, 2003/11/16
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] unmatched files, Colin Walters, 2003/11/16
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] unmatched files, Tom Lord, 2003/11/16
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] unmatched files, Andrew Suffield, 2003/11/16
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] unmatched files, Colin Walters, 2003/11/16