[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: is there demand for itla?
From: |
Andrew Suffield |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: is there demand for itla? |
Date: |
Thu, 20 Nov 2003 14:46:56 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.4i |
On Thu, Nov 20, 2003 at 10:26:06AM +0000, Bruce Stephens wrote:
> And what's wrong with
> Fortran-9x/95/2001 as replacements?
I am given to understand that all the available implementations
suck. That's what I heard from the physicists while I was at
university, anyway.
--
.''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield
: :' : http://www.debian.org/ |
`. `' |
`- -><- |
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] OT: Lisp, (continued)
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: OT: Lisp, Miles Bader, 2003/11/19
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] is there demand for itla?, Andrew Suffield, 2003/11/20
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: is there demand for itla?, Miles Bader, 2003/11/20
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: is there demand for itla?, Andrew Suffield, 2003/11/20
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: is there demand for itla?, Miles Bader, 2003/11/20
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: is there demand for itla?, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2003/11/20
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: is there demand for itla?, Bruce Stephens, 2003/11/20
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: is there demand for itla?,
Andrew Suffield <=
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] is there demand for itla?, Andrea Arcangeli, 2003/11/18
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] is there demand for itla?, Doran, 2003/11/17
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] is there demand for itla?, Tom Lord, 2003/11/17
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] is there demand for itla?, Clark McGrew, 2003/11/17
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] is there demand for itla?, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2003/11/18