[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Savannah vs. Open Software License
From: |
Adam Sampson |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Savannah vs. Open Software License |
Date: |
Thu, 20 Nov 2003 19:39:50 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.1002 (Gnus v5.10.2) Emacs/21.3 (gnu/linux) |
Thomas Zander <address@hidden> writes:
>> This clause makes life very unpleasant for mirror sites:
> I'm not sure why you say that;
It's unpleasant because free-software sites that are already being
mirrored are starting to include OSL-licensed software, and thus the
mirrors may now be breaking the terms of the license without realising
it. Click-wrap licenses are highly inconvenient for mirror site users.
> in my (personal) book, this licence is not free.
I entirely agree.
--
Adam Sampson <address@hidden> <http://offog.org/>
- [Gnu-arch-users] Savannah vs. Open Software License, Samium Gromoff, 2003/11/17
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Savannah vs. Open Software License, Anselm Lingnau, 2003/11/17
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Savannah vs. Open Software License, Andrew Suffield, 2003/11/17
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Savannah vs. Open Software License, Miles Bader, 2003/11/17
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Savannah vs. Open Software License, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2003/11/18
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Savannah vs. Open Software License, Adam Sampson, 2003/11/20