[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] What I think 1.1 gold needs:
From: |
Andrew Suffield |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] What I think 1.1 gold needs: |
Date: |
Tue, 25 Nov 2003 14:09:26 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.4i |
On Tue, Nov 25, 2003 at 09:37:44PM +1100, Robert Collins wrote:
> * umask support - if 1.2 is delayed, 1.1 may end up in the next debian
> stable, and without effective multi user support... that would be a long
> term headache.
> * doco updates - hardlinks, hooks, .arch-inventories. The list goes on.
> Is there a current doco maintainer?
> * Merging of a couple of features that complement hardlink support
> heavily.
And from a different angle: bug #6696 needs understanding (since it
may be nasty), and tree-lint needs to trap tagged-and-not-source files
(fixes several bugs).
--
.''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield
: :' : http://www.debian.org/ |
`. `' |
`- -><- |
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature