[Gnu-arch-users] Re: What I think 1.1 gold needs:

[Robert Collins]

On Wed, 2003-11-26 at 12:20, Miles Bader wrote:
> Proper inode-state-speedup support (supportr explicit tags, correct
> updating after a replay/update) would be nice too, but since that's not
> an interface change, I figure it can wait until 1.1.1 or whatever.
> 
> Actually I'd think that anything that isn't an _incompatible_ change (as
> the various CLI syntax changes were) could similarly wait -- doing a
> serious of post-1.1 minor releases to add various new extensions like
> umask support seems like a reasonable thing to me.

Post release, only bugfixes should be applied to the stable branch -
that is the point of it after all.

Rob

-- 
GPG key available at: <http://www.robertcollins.net/keys.txt>.

signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part