[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: What I think 1.1 gold needs:
From: |
Stephen J. Turnbull |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: What I think 1.1 gold needs: |
Date: |
Wed, 26 Nov 2003 23:59:51 +0900 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.1002 (Gnus v5.10.2) XEmacs/21.5 (celeriac, linux) |
>>>>> "Miles" == Miles Bader <address@hidden> writes:
Miles> I think it's perfectly fine to add certain sorts of
Miles> features as long as the interface remains stable; in
Miles> particular, filling in certain sorts of missing
Miles> functionality (e.g., fixing the current incompleteness of
Miles> the inode-state optimizations) seems quite kosher, and the
Miles> sort of change featured in the minor releases of _most_
Miles> programs.
For what it's worth, python-dev has this discussion perennially, and
after the releases of 2.3.1 and 2.3.2 in early autumn, the release
manager remarked that he'd had a fair number of "thank you" mails, and
that most didn't mention features at all, but of those which did, all
said something equivalent to "Thank God you added no new features."
--
Institute of Policy and Planning Sciences http://turnbull.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp
University of Tsukuba Tennodai 1-1-1 Tsukuba 305-8573 JAPAN
Ask not how you can "do" free software business;
ask what your business can "do for" free software.