[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Portability of archives?
From: |
Andrew Suffield |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Portability of archives? |
Date: |
Thu, 27 Nov 2003 01:05:34 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.4i |
On Thu, Nov 27, 2003 at 09:50:29AM +0900, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
> >>>>> "Tom" == Tom Lord <address@hidden> writes:
>
> Tom> If it supports ssh, you should be able to get an sftp setup
> Tom> running, perhaps with some (pretty trivial) "local
> Tom> customization" of the tla sftp transport.
>
> Huh? sftp requires a separate binary _on the server_, and must be
> enabled in the sshd configuration _on the server_.
The former he can do: he has ssh access. The latter is not actually
true - you can use the -s argument to sftp to select the subsystem
binary to execute on the server.
--
.''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield
: :' : http://www.debian.org/ |
`. `' |
`- -><- |
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
- [Gnu-arch-users] Portability of archives?, Samuel A. Falvo II, 2003/11/26
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Portability of archives?, Miles Bader, 2003/11/26
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Portability of archives?, Samuel A. Falvo II, 2003/11/26
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Portability of archives?, Charles Duffy, 2003/11/26
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Portability of archives?, Tom Lord, 2003/11/26
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Portability of archives?, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2003/11/26
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Portability of archives?,
Andrew Suffield <=
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Portability of archives?, Tom Lord, 2003/11/26
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Portability of archives?, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2003/11/27
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Portability of archives?, Tom Lord, 2003/11/26
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Portability of archives?, Samuel A. Falvo II, 2003/11/27
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Portability of archives?, Robert Collins, 2003/11/26