[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Gnu-arch-users] Re: patch-log sizes
From: |
Pau Aliagas |
Subject: |
[Gnu-arch-users] Re: patch-log sizes |
Date: |
Wed, 17 Dec 2003 09:26:00 +0100 (CET) |
On Tue, 16 Dec 2003, Dustin Sallings wrote:
>
> On Dec 16, 2003, at 14:51, Tom Lord wrote:
>
> > The other is log pruning. Do I understand that you've made a tree
> > that carries around several years worth of patch log history? If that
> > development had been done natively in arch, odds are that are along
> > the way there would have been some discarding of old logs (perhaps
> > stashing a ChangeLog of what's being discarded, for human readers).
> > You might wnat your gateway program to emulate that.
>
> I assume this means by branching to a new archive, right? Are there
> any problems with ``retiring'' an old archive (i.e. making it
> unavailable)?
Isn't all this soved by cacherev?
You have 1000 log entries in a project. You tag another branch and
cacherev base-0. You don't need the old patches anymore. so you can
"retire" the old archive.
Pau
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: patch-log sizes, (continued)
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: patch-log sizes, Tom Lord, 2003/12/17
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: patch-log sizes, Tupshin Harper, 2003/12/17
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: patch-log sizes, Tom Lord, 2003/12/17
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: patch-log sizes, Miles Bader, 2003/12/17
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: patch-log sizes, Tom Lord, 2003/12/17
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] patch-log sizes, Dustin Sallings, 2003/12/16
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] patch-log sizes, Marco Zühlke, 2003/12/19
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] patch-log sizes, Andrew Suffield, 2003/12/17