[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Auto-registration
From: |
Tom Lord |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Auto-registration |
Date: |
Thu, 5 Feb 2004 15:18:42 -0800 (PST) |
> From: Miles Bader <address@hidden>
> No, I don't think that's what Stefan was asking; he means:
> Why can't:
> tla get METH://LONG/PATH/NAME/FINAL-COMPONENT DEST-DIR
> be automatically expanded into:
> tla register-archive --no-complain METH://LONG/PATH/NAME
> => ARCHIVE-NAME
> tla get ARCHIVE-NAME/FINAL-COMPONENT DEST-DIR
> To be honest I'm not sure; it does appear to be a basically unambiguous
and
> really fairly easy to implement. There's no need to worry about the
> archive's actual structure, just the path to its root (the actual archive
> grovelling is completely through existing tla commands).
> BTW, I added the --no-complain option with the intended meaning: `if the
> registration already exists, don't complain, just check to see that it
> hasn't changed'.
For that matter, why not:
tla build-cfg --no-complain --get METH://LONG..../FINAL cfg
which registers, gets the top level project, and builds the config?
(And, is there any reason why --no-complain shouldn't be the only
behavior? Would one ever want --complain?)
-t
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Auto-registration, (continued)
[Gnu-arch-users] Re: Auto-registration, Stefan Monnier, 2004/02/05
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Auto-registration, Miles Bader, 2004/02/05
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Auto-registration,
Tom Lord <=
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Auto-registration, Brian May, 2004/02/06
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Auto-registration, Aaron Bentley, 2004/02/06
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Auto-registration, Robert Collins, 2004/02/06
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Auto-registration, Brian May, 2004/02/08
[Gnu-arch-users] Re: Auto-registration, Stefan Monnier, 2004/02/05
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Auto-registration, Miles Bader, 2004/02/05
Message not available
[Gnu-arch-users] Re: Auto-registration, Stefan Monnier, 2004/02/06