[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] decoupling pfs/archive-pfs and the archive format
From: |
Johannes Berg |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] decoupling pfs/archive-pfs and the archive format |
Date: |
Mon, 09 Feb 2004 19:41:41 +0100 |
On Mon, 2004-02-09 at 19:46, Tom Lord wrote:
> I gather that you want to make an archive format which is based on a
> dumb-fs transport (hence, uses the pfs layer) but which is not the
> same as the current dumb-fs format (hence, does _not_ use the
> archive-pfs layer). Is that correct?
Exactly.
> Later, if the new format proves to be a win, we can explore how to
> integrate it with archive-pfs.
Umm, ok. I already started and its working great, but I guess I can
backtrack and adapt my code to have different URIs. Will do that once
I'm done prototyping my archive (format and implementation).
[what I'm working on is encrypted archives which I thought stupid to
tack on top of the hackerlab format]
johannes
--
http://www.sipsolutions.de/
Key-ID: 9AB78CA5 Johannes Martin Berg <address@hidden>
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
- [Gnu-arch-users] decoupling pfs/archive-pfs and the archive format, Johannes Berg, 2004/02/06
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] decoupling pfs/archive-pfs and the archive format, Tom Lord, 2004/02/09
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] decoupling pfs/archive-pfs and the archive format,
Johannes Berg <=
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] decoupling pfs/archive-pfs and the archive format, Tom Lord, 2004/02/09
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] decoupling pfs/archive-pfs and the archive format, Johannes Berg, 2004/02/09
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] decoupling pfs/archive-pfs and the archive format, Johannes Berg, 2004/02/09
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] decoupling pfs/archive-pfs and the archive format, Tom Lord, 2004/02/09
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] decoupling pfs/archive-pfs and the archive format, Johannes Berg, 2004/02/09