[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: BK-like functionality (was Re: [Gnu-arch-users] arch/subversion comp
From: |
Colin Walters |
Subject: |
Re: BK-like functionality (was Re: [Gnu-arch-users] arch/subversion comparison question) |
Date: |
Fri, 12 Mar 2004 11:29:49 -0500 |
On Thu, 2004-03-11 at 13:04, Tom Lord wrote:
> One idea is to work out how to store your personal arch project trees
> in a Subversion archive. The intention of the idea is that
> minute-to-minute, you can have a CVS-like experience but then, when
> you want to coordinate with others, you have arch.
Yuck! I think you are being too kind to Subversion :) I don't see any
advantages from doing that, and several disadvantages.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] arch/subversion comparison question, David Brown, 2004/03/10
[Gnu-arch-users] Re: arch/subversion comparison question, Miles Bader, 2004/03/10
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] arch/subversion comparison question, Rob Weir, 2004/03/10
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] arch/subversion comparison question, Jan Hudec, 2004/03/10