[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: BK-like functionality (was Re: [Gnu-arch-users] arch/subversion comp
From: |
Denys Duchier |
Subject: |
Re: BK-like functionality (was Re: [Gnu-arch-users] arch/subversion comparison question) |
Date: |
Fri, 12 Mar 2004 22:07:46 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.110002 (No Gnus v0.2) Emacs/21.3 (gnu/linux) |
Tom Lord <address@hidden> writes:
> One idea is to work out how to store your personal arch project trees
> in a Subversion archive. The intention of the idea is that
> minute-to-minute, you can have a CVS-like experience but then, when
> you want to coordinate with others, you have arch.
>
> Now, to be sure -- for some of us this an absurdity. The idea of
> running a Subversion archive is not attractive. This combination
> idea is horribly bloated and so forth.
I don't know: if we are just talking about a SVN fs, then it doesn't
seem entirely absurd to use just that to provide smart revlib
support.
Cheers,
--
Dr. Denys Duchier - Équipe Calligramme - LORIA, Nancy, FRANCE
AIM: duchierdenys
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] arch/subversion comparison question, David Brown, 2004/03/10
[Gnu-arch-users] Re: arch/subversion comparison question, Miles Bader, 2004/03/10
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] arch/subversion comparison question, Rob Weir, 2004/03/10
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] arch/subversion comparison question, Jan Hudec, 2004/03/10
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] arch/subversion comparison question, Adrian Irving-Beer, 2004/03/10