[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Gnu-arch-users] Re: BK-like functionality (was Re: arch/subversion comp
From: |
Stefan Monnier |
Subject: |
[Gnu-arch-users] Re: BK-like functionality (was Re: arch/subversion comparison question) |
Date: |
14 Mar 2004 21:36:17 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3.50 |
> No, I meant something different. Roughly speaking, a system where
> "between arch commits" you have a system that feels more or less like
> CVS (file rather than changeset oriented) and "at arch commits" just
> summarizes a collection of those CVS-like commits as a changeset.
In a similar vein, VC (the Emacs generic front end) allows the user to
create a brand new RCS archive for a file under CVS control (it should work
with any rev-control backend, but IIRC it makes some ill chosen assumptions
about rev-numbers), do some commits into it and then commit the sum of all
those changes into CVS.
It's not what we want here, tho.
Stefan
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] arch/subversion comparison question, Charles Duffy, 2004/03/10
Re: BK-like functionality (was Re: [Gnu-arch-users] arch/subversion comparison question), Robin Green, 2004/03/13
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] arch/subversion comparison question, David Brown, 2004/03/10
[Gnu-arch-users] Re: arch/subversion comparison question, Miles Bader, 2004/03/10
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] arch/subversion comparison question, Rob Weir, 2004/03/10
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] arch/subversion comparison question, Jan Hudec, 2004/03/10
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] arch/subversion comparison question, Adrian Irving-Beer, 2004/03/10
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] arch/subversion comparison question, Florian Weimer, 2004/03/15