[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Gnu-arch-users] Re: grokking arch
From: |
Matthew Dempsky |
Subject: |
[Gnu-arch-users] Re: grokking arch |
Date: |
24 Mar 2004 22:41:00 -0600 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3 |
Miles Bader <address@hidden> writes:
> You can lookup past flame-wars on this list for details, but UUIDs are
> basically `safer' for several reasons, and embody the essential spirit
> of taglines a bit more purely (they are meaningless strings, which need
> only be unique).
I can understand that... recently in a major API change in Pika I did
a global s/cports/ports/ and unfortunately a few files had cports in
the tagline and with all the modified files I missed the D and A lines
in tla changes. However, the next patch I changed them back which
resulted in another D/A pair, but at least once I star-merged them
into my integration branch the little patch incident became a mere
artifact of changelog history.
> I think Tom uses what he does because that's what his emacs frob
> happens to generate and he doesn't care enough to change it.
I use that frob too. :-)
-jivera
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] grokking arch, (continued)
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] grokking arch, Matthew Dempsky, 2004/03/24
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: grokking arch, Miles Bader, 2004/03/24
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: grokking arch, Tom Lord, 2004/03/24
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: grokking arch,
Matthew Dempsky <=
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: grokking arch, Stefan Monnier, 2004/03/25
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: grokking arch, Charles Duffy, 2004/03/25
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: grokking arch, Stefan Monnier, 2004/03/25
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: grokking arch, Charles Duffy, 2004/03/25
[Gnu-arch-users] Re: grokking arch, Miles Bader, 2004/03/24