[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Gnu-arch-users] Re: grokking arch
From: |
Miles Bader |
Subject: |
[Gnu-arch-users] Re: grokking arch |
Date: |
25 Mar 2004 11:20:23 +0900 |
Robin Green <address@hidden> writes:
> How can Bitmover restrict you from talking about alternatives to Bitkeeper
> *internally*?
Well who knows what they will and/or can (legally) do, but I've
certainly gotten the impressions from L-M's ravings on the lkml that he
would like to do such things, or at least that he wants people to
_think_ he would.
I've gotten very little sense of a coherent _policy_ behind BK
licensing, more like if L-M likes you get a license, otherwise ...
"No BK for you!"
-Miles
--
"Whatever you do will be insignificant, but it is very important that
you do it." Mahatma Gandhi