[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Some issues
From: |
Andrew Suffield |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Some issues |
Date: |
Wed, 9 Jun 2004 16:54:12 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.6+20040523i |
On Wed, Jun 09, 2004 at 11:47:35AM -0400, Milan Cvetkovic wrote:
> Andrew Suffield wrote:
> >On Wed, Jun 09, 2004 at 04:03:27PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
>
> --- snipped ---
>
> >>Categories, branches, and versions are not orthogonal at all and add
> >>unnecessary complexity. Future features cannot differentiate between
> >>them because they are used very inconsistently in existing archives.
> >
> >
> >No idea what that is supposed to mean. They're just names. Almost
> >everything just wants a version specifier, and doesn't care about the
> >fact that the '--'s in the string have significance.
>
> No, they are not just the names.
>
> Version must consist of digits and dots only.
Relevance? To almost every tool, it's just a string that gets passed
through.
--
.''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield
: :' : http://www.debian.org/ |
`. `' |
`- -><- |
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Some issues, Aaron Bentley, 2004/06/09
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Some issues, Milan Cvetkovic, 2004/06/09
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Some issues,
Andrew Suffield <=
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Some issues, Milan Cvetkovic, 2004/06/09
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Some issues, Andrew Suffield, 2004/06/09
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Some issues, Milan Cvetkovic, 2004/06/09
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Some issues, Andrew Suffield, 2004/06/09
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Some issues, Milan Cvetkovic, 2004/06/09
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Some issues, Andrew Suffield, 2004/06/09
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Some issues, Cameron Patrick, 2004/06/09