Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Some issues

[Andrew Suffield]

On Wed, Jun 09, 2004 at 01:46:17PM -0400, Milan Cvetkovic wrote:
> Andrew Suffield wrote:
> >On Wed, Jun 09, 2004 at 01:11:39PM -0400, Milan Cvetkovic wrote:
> >
> >>>>>>>>Categories, branches, and versions are not orthogonal at all and add
> >>>>>>>>unnecessary complexity. Future features cannot differentiate between
> >>>>>>>>them because they are used very inconsistently in existing archives.

> >>I want version to be the project version rather than branch 
> >>version. It would be usefull to me - a human. And it is relevant to me.
> >>Most Arch archives look too disorganized because of this.
> >
> >
> >Sounds pretty irrelevant to me.
> 
> I know that it is irrelevant to you.
> 
> But it is you who said that they are just the names, when in fact they 
> are not.

The faint wooshing sound is the point, and even subject of
conversation, flying over your head.

> All I am trying to say is that there are some users and some potential 
> users who do find this quite annoying.
> 
> And I presume this is the reason why the original poster put it in his 
> "things he does not like about tla".

...as best I can make out, this is "see the word 'category', assume
it's complaining about this particular thing I don't like".

-- 
  .''`.  ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield
 : :' :  http://www.debian.org/ |
 `. `'                          |
   `-             -><-          |

signature.asc
Description: Digital signature