[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Some issues
From: |
Andrew Suffield |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Some issues |
Date: |
Wed, 9 Jun 2004 18:24:42 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.6+20040523i |
On Wed, Jun 09, 2004 at 07:21:44PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
> * Andrew Suffield:
>
> > POSIX ACLs are a complete solution to this problem
>
> POSIX ACLs can only be a solution if they are available (and they are
> not too buggy to be usable). The "dumb server" paradigm loses a lot
> of its charm if you need a special kernel, patched coreutils, and so
> on.
You've neatly cut out the problem, which has got nothing to do with
tla. It's a problem that you always face when doing a lot of work with
unix groups. POSIX ACLs are the solution.
--
.''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield
: :' : http://www.debian.org/ |
`. `' |
`- -><- |
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Some issues, Florian Weimer, 2004/06/09
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Some issues, Andrew Suffield, 2004/06/09
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Some issues, Florian Weimer, 2004/06/09
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Some issues, Andrew Suffield, 2004/06/09
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Some issues, Florian Weimer, 2004/06/09
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Some issues, Andrew Suffield, 2004/06/09
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Some issues, Florian Weimer, 2004/06/09
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Some issues, Andrew Suffield, 2004/06/09
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Some issues, Florian Weimer, 2004/06/09