[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: hackerlab broken?
From: |
Tom Lord |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: hackerlab broken? |
Date: |
Sun, 13 Jun 2004 18:32:54 -0700 (PDT) |
> From: Miles Bader <address@hidden>
> I wrote:
> > Is the `current'[*] hackerlab known to be broken?
> Hmmm, now I see:
> patch-74
> (non-compiling) ustr rewrite milestone
> Reverting that patch seems to make things work...
How embarassing.
Yes, I indulged with patch-74 but meant to cover it up by
mirroring only after it was fixed. Perhaps you updated
while the mirror was updating or perhaps I screwed up but, in any
event, the current head revision(s) should all be fine.
-t
- [Gnu-arch-users] hackerlab broken?, Miles Bader, 2004/06/08
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: hackerlab broken?, Miles Bader, 2004/06/08
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: hackerlab broken?,
Tom Lord <=
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: hackerlab broken?, Charles Duffy, 2004/06/14
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: hackerlab broken?, Miles Bader, 2004/06/24
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: hackerlab broken?, Tez Kamihira, 2004/06/24
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: hackerlab broken?, Tom Lord, 2004/06/24
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: hackerlab broken?, Miles Bader, 2004/06/24
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: hackerlab broken?, Tom Lord, 2004/06/24
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: hackerlab broken?, Miles Bader, 2004/06/24
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: hackerlab broken?, Tom Lord, 2004/06/24
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: hackerlab broken?, Miles Bader, 2004/06/24
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: hackerlab broken?, Miles Bader, 2004/06/24