[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: hackerlab broken?
From: |
Charles Duffy |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: hackerlab broken? |
Date: |
Mon, 14 Jun 2004 11:34:51 -0500 |
On Sun, 2004-06-13 at 20:32, Tom Lord wrote:
> > From: Miles Bader <address@hidden>
>
> > I wrote:
> > > Is the `current'[*] hackerlab known to be broken?
>
> > Hmmm, now I see:
>
> > patch-74
> > (non-compiling) ustr rewrite milestone
>
> > Reverting that patch seems to make things work...
>
> How embarassing.
>
> Yes, I indulged with patch-74 but meant to cover it up by
> mirroring only after it was fixed. Perhaps you updated
> while the mirror was updating or perhaps I screwed up but, in any
> event, the current head revision(s) should all be fine.
Head (address@hidden/hackerlab--devo--1.0--patch-78) appears still broken.
- [Gnu-arch-users] hackerlab broken?, Miles Bader, 2004/06/08
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: hackerlab broken?, Miles Bader, 2004/06/08
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: hackerlab broken?, Tom Lord, 2004/06/13
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: hackerlab broken?,
Charles Duffy <=
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: hackerlab broken?, Miles Bader, 2004/06/24
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: hackerlab broken?, Tez Kamihira, 2004/06/24
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: hackerlab broken?, Tom Lord, 2004/06/24
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: hackerlab broken?, Miles Bader, 2004/06/24
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: hackerlab broken?, Tom Lord, 2004/06/24
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: hackerlab broken?, Miles Bader, 2004/06/24
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: hackerlab broken?, Tom Lord, 2004/06/24
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: hackerlab broken?, Miles Bader, 2004/06/24
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: hackerlab broken?, Miles Bader, 2004/06/24
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: hackerlab broken?, Richard Curnow, 2004/06/25