Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: arch on windows?

[Stig Brautaset]

On Wed, Jul 14, 2004 at 10:08:01AM +0100, Adam Sampson wrote:
> John Meinel <address@hidden> writes:
> 
> > So if all we do is switch from {arch}/c/c--b/c--b--v/c--b--v--p-nn.* to
> > {arch}/c/--b/--v/--p-nn.* (I'm leaving in the -- because 'b' can be
> > empty) we'll probably have a 75% solution.
> 
> I think I'd prefer {arch}/c--/b--/v--/p-nn.* -- filenames starting
> with "--" have the potential to irritate people even more than those
> starting with "{".

How about just c/b/v/p-nn with "=null" in place of branch if it is
empty? It has been suggested before (not by me). I guess it means you
have to use a special case though.

Anyway, I don't see Tom agreeing to such a change anytime soon... :)

Stig