gnu-arch-users
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: arch on windows?


From: Aaron Bentley
Subject: Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: arch on windows?
Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2004 15:32:01 -0400
User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.5 (X11/20040309)

Ron Parker wrote:
On Wed, 14 Jul 2004 14:58:01 -0400, Aaron Bentley
<address@hidden> wrote:


Ron Parker wrote:
Many of us use the *entire* current-working-directory in our shell
prompts, and this is the default on major Linux distributions.  Such
paths are ugly and awkward in this context.


This is exactly why I change my PS1 when I am {arch} diving, just to
avoid the noise on my screen, then the c--b--v directory names become
handy.

With short pathnames, those who use the last fragment of the cwd in their prompts could change their PS1 when they are {arch} diving, and reap similar benefits.

They are also more difficult to navigate than necessary-- they
more-or-less demand tab completion.


Personally I am a lazy programmer, I tend to bang tab until it stops
working then I start consciously typing again whether the form is
c/b/v or c/c--b/c--b--v.

Yeah, I'm lazy too. I'd like to type cd f[TAB]/b[TAB]/[TAB]p[TAB]53 to navigate to foo/bar/0/patch-53.

I've no need to prove that my preference is best, just to show that there are other reasonable preferences.

Aaron

--
Aaron Bentley
Director of Technology
Panometrics, Inc.




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]