[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Unsucessful application of patches, without any err
From: |
James Livingston |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Unsucessful application of patches, without any error |
Date: |
Sun, 08 May 2005 00:36:57 +1000 |
On Sat, 2005-05-07 at 09:16 -0500, John A Meinel wrote:
> Did the file in question have a space in the name?
Nope, in this case the files were sources/rb-sourcelist.{h,c}
<snip explanation of what "?M" means>
> Anyway, tla before 1.2 something didn't handle spaces in filenames, so
> it is possible that it just can't find the file.
There are other patches by the same person (both before, and after) that
modify the above two files and don't show this problem. My other guess
was that the patch had gotten corrupted somewhere, but 1.2.1 and 1.3
both do the right thing, which makes this less likely.
It's not a complex patch either, the changes to the two files that don't
work are a couple of lines added/changed.
Cheers,
James "Doc" Livingston
--
You wouldn't know a subtle plan if it painted itself purple and danced
naked on top of a harpsichord singing 'Subtle Plans Are Here Again'
-- Lord Blackadder
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
- [Gnu-arch-users] Unsucessful application of patches, without any error, James Livingston, 2005/05/07
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Unsucessful application of patches, without any error, John A Meinel, 2005/05/07
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Unsucessful application of patches, without any error,
James Livingston <=
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Unsucessful application of patches, without any error, John A Meinel, 2005/05/07
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Unsucessful application of patches, without any error, James Livingston, 2005/05/07
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Unsucessful application of patches, without any error, John A Meinel, 2005/05/07
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Unsucessful application of patches, withoutany error, James Livingston, 2005/05/07