gnu-crypto-discuss
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [GNU Crypto] beyond 1.1


From: Raif S. Naffah
Subject: Re: [GNU Crypto] beyond 1.1
Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2003 07:10:53 +1100
User-agent: KMail/1.4.3

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: RIPEMD160

On Friday 28 February 2003 05:03, Casey Marshall wrote:
> On Wed, 2003-02-26 at 00:19, Raif S. Naffah wrote:
> > On Wednesday 26 February 2003 08:42, Casey Marshall wrote:
> > > Heck, it could be nothing more than an enhanced version of jar
> > > that can encrypt entries. That would be easy to put together
> > > (though a plain Jar with encrypted entries *may* provide too much
> > > information as it is...).
> >
> > implementing it as a jar tool rather than a zip/unzip tool offers
> > more possibilities!  a[n encrypted] jar generated by such tool,
> > would benefit from a special classloader akin to the one that
> > verifies signed entries.  what benefits do encrypted+signed entries
> > offer v/s signed-only entries is a different matter :-)
>
> I suppose it could be possible (to an extent) to only have code
> executed in the case where the one *running* the program is trusted
> to do so...

...or feeds the system a token that contains the "right" credentials to 
decrypt the code.


>... Sounds like an application better suited for proprietary
> software, however...
>
> In the least it would be a way to bring strong encryption to the
> great unwashed masses in a form they already understand (zip files).

correct.


cheers;
rsn
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Que du magnifique

iD8DBQE+XnDO+e1AKnsTRiERA8hTAKCQnWsD8sbK7AuT/zB92UNzHxkuFQCfXHuD
z93Jxsa94Sk0hs0RHjb9nR8=
=9oma
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]