Fwd: [GNU-linux-libre] A call to free software, and its users

[Diego Saravia]

2009/8/19 Alexandre Oliva <address@hidden>:
> On Aug 19, 2009, Diego Saravia <address@hidden> wrote:
>
>> trying to separate code from data is like argue about angel's shoulders
>
> There seems to be an assumed dichotomy here that isn't true.
>
>> every data codification could be use to encode software, or seen as software
>
> Every piece of code is data, true.  And irrelevant.
>
> The important question is whether a particular piece of data is
> information for practical use.


I do not agree with that concept

For me is equal relevant non free software, than non free art


> Yeah, it does.  It's unfortunate that the user isn't informed about it,
> but it's not even close to actually demanding the user to install and
> run non-Free Software.


not? runing non free is less important to .... inform user that there
is a way to run non-free?


> presented to it for execution, specifically demands non-Free Software to
> be installed.

demands?

not sugest?

not inform that a file is missing?

thats worst than RUN non-free?????????




--
Diego Saravia
address@hidden
NO FUNCIONA->address@hidden



-- 
Diego Saravia
address@hidden
NO FUNCIONA->address@hidden