Re: comment on the LilyPond documantation

[Atte André Jensen]

On Thu, 19 Oct 2000, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:

> address@hidden writes:
> > Now, Mup is shareware, so in order to make money they have have a clean
> > docu. But I really feel this is something important that needs attention
> > for Lily to reach out to "the people". Needless to say, I'd much prefer to
> > do my work in Lily, since it's open source and have much more elegant
> > code.
> > 
> > Comments????
> 
> Yes: why don't you try to figure out how Lily works, and write the
> documentation yourself. Other will love you for it.

I see your point, and I can honestly say I wasn't pointing fingers at
anyone in particular. Well for me writing the documentation I'd have to
spend quite a lotta time on figuring everything out for myself.

If I hang around long enough to reach some degree of clarity 'bout Lily,
and the documentation is still missing, I sure will volunteer to help
write it.
-- 
Atte André Jensen