[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Package format/management ramblingss
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: Package format/management ramblingss |
Date: |
Tue, 03 Aug 2004 15:38:26 -0400 |
> However, having some sort of per-user customizability might be nice
> too. Each user could have a package subdir of his home dir.
Does this mean the user ``contributes'' packages to the system?
Or does it mean the system looks different for each user, which accords
to my idea?
I mean it could look different for each user. My scheme didn't include
that, but that's what I think you are suggesting, and it seems like
a good idea. Thanks.
By the way: I meanwhile heard about unionfs, which is probably what I
considered.
My idea is that /bin will be something like unionfs.
- Re: Package format/management ramblingss, Soeren D. Schulze, 2004/08/02
- Message not available
- Re: Package format/management ramblingss, Soeren D. Schulze, 2004/08/02
- Message not available
- Re: Package format/management ramblingss, Soeren D. Schulze, 2004/08/02
- Re: Package format/management ramblingss,
Richard Stallman <=
- Re: Package format/management ramblingss, Soeren D. Schulze, 2004/08/04
- Re: Package format/management ramblingss, Richard Stallman, 2004/08/05
- Re: Package format/management ramblingss, Marco Gerards, 2004/08/05
- Re: Package format/management ramblingss, Richard Stallman, 2004/08/07
- Re: Package format/management ramblingss, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2004/08/08
- Re: Package format/management ramblingss, Richard Stallman, 2004/08/09
- Re: Package format/management ramblingss, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2004/08/08
- Re: Package format/management ramblingss, Soeren D. Schulze, 2004/08/09
- Re: Package format/management ramblingss, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2004/08/09
- Re: Package format/management ramblingss, Soeren D. Schulze, 2004/08/10