[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Comparing PackageFS and GNU PM
From: |
Luca Ferroni |
Subject: |
Re: Comparing PackageFS and GNU PM |
Date: |
Mon, 27 Sep 2004 11:20:06 +0200 |
Il Mon, 27 Sep 2004 10:55:05 +0200, "Alfred M. Szmidt" <address@hidden> ha
scritto:
> But it does not affect in the / translator. This latter has to be
> implemented anyway in order to show in /bin the files that
> PackageFS put into /packages/*/bin and so on.
>
> Ok, I think see what you are suggestion. And I don't think this is a
> good idea; if I think I know what you think.
>
> Having to write a specific translator that "puts" things in
> /packages/* is not the way to go.
> It is far far simpler to have one
> translator that just follows a link/directory that is created in
> /packages from the start without a extra layer. I don't even see the
> purpose of such a layer.
I don't think this layer add complexity to your translator,
because it shouldn't affect it in any way.
It is just seen by the user, not by the system.
> So I don't see the purpose of what you have suggested.
This second translator simplifies user approach to package management.
That's why I said that we don't need this one now.
Bye
Luca
--
Luca Ferroni
www.cs.unibo.it/~fferroni/
Re: Comparing PackageFS and GNU PM, Richard Stallman, 2004/09/26
- Re: Comparing PackageFS and GNU PM, Luca Ferroni, 2004/09/26
- Re: Comparing PackageFS and GNU PM, Richard Stallman, 2004/09/27
- Re: Comparing PackageFS and GNU PM, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2004/09/27
- Re: Comparing PackageFS and GNU PM, Luca Ferroni, 2004/09/27
- Re: Comparing PackageFS and GNU PM, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2004/09/27
- Re: Comparing PackageFS and GNU PM,
Luca Ferroni <=
- Re: Comparing PackageFS and GNU PM, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2004/09/27
- Re: Comparing PackageFS and GNU PM, Luca Ferroni, 2004/09/27
- Re: Comparing PackageFS and GNU PM, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2004/09/27