[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Comparing PackageFS and GNU PM
From: |
Luca Ferroni |
Subject: |
Re: Comparing PackageFS and GNU PM |
Date: |
Mon, 27 Sep 2004 12:04:43 +0200 |
Il Mon, 27 Sep 2004 11:42:21 +0200, "Alfred M. Szmidt" <address@hidden> ha
scritto:
> I don't think this layer add complexity to your translator, because
> it shouldn't affect it in any way. It is just seen by the user,
> not by the system.
>
> Well, the thing is, I still don't understand what it would be used
> for; only what it would do more or less. Do you mean that it would be
> something like the package-by-category translator I suggested before?
The read part is similar to the package-by-category translator.
The write part (symlink or mdir syscall) installs the package in the Hurdish
way.
That is:
- call GSC and make symlink
A user who run this translator will experience these facilities
Bye
Luca
--
Luca Ferroni
www.cs.unibo.it/~fferroni/
- Re: Comparing PackageFS and GNU PM, (continued)
Re: Comparing PackageFS and GNU PM, Richard Stallman, 2004/09/26
- Re: Comparing PackageFS and GNU PM, Luca Ferroni, 2004/09/26
- Re: Comparing PackageFS and GNU PM, Richard Stallman, 2004/09/27
- Re: Comparing PackageFS and GNU PM, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2004/09/27
- Re: Comparing PackageFS and GNU PM, Luca Ferroni, 2004/09/27
- Re: Comparing PackageFS and GNU PM, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2004/09/27
- Re: Comparing PackageFS and GNU PM, Luca Ferroni, 2004/09/27
- Re: Comparing PackageFS and GNU PM, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2004/09/27
- Re: Comparing PackageFS and GNU PM,
Luca Ferroni <=
- Re: Comparing PackageFS and GNU PM, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2004/09/27