[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: A GNU Distribution
From: |
Claudio Fontana |
Subject: |
Re: A GNU Distribution |
Date: |
Sun, 1 Apr 2012 10:22:13 +0200 |
On Sun, Apr 1, 2012 at 5:07 AM, Richard Stallman <address@hidden> wrote:
> It needn't be hard. Indeed, I'm sure that the installer/package
> manager/whatever
> could be made to handle dependencies. Source-based doesn't *have* to mean
> manually compiling everything yourself.
>
> I won't say that can be so, but I don't understand it concretely.
> What would "source-based" mean, here, if it doesn't mean
> "You compile everything yourself"?
>
As I understand it, the packages would contain both the binaries
(already built, no need for the user to compile anything herself) and
the _corresponding_ source code. Not just making the source available
somehow, somewhere, or through the explicit configuration and download
of separate packages, but making it an integral part of the system.
Is that what you meant Daniel?
Ciao,
Claudio
- Re: A GNU Distribution, Richard Stallman, 2012/04/01
- Re: A GNU Distribution,
Claudio Fontana <=
- Re: A GNU Distribution, Richard Stallman, 2012/04/02
- Re: A GNU Distribution, Daniel Martin, 2012/04/02
- Re: A GNU Distribution, Dave Crossland, 2012/04/02
- Re: A GNU Distribution, Christophe Poncy, 2012/04/03
- Re: A GNU Distribution, Richard Stallman, 2012/04/08
- Re: A GNU Distribution, Brandon Invergo, 2012/04/09
- Re: A GNU Distribution, Richard Stallman, 2012/04/09
- Re: A GNU Distribution, Claudio Fontana, 2012/04/10
- Re: A GNU Distribution, Brandon Invergo, 2012/04/10
- Re: A GNU Distribution, Claudio Fontana, 2012/04/10