Re: Comments on the HR Draft

[Neil Tiffin]

At 3:35 PM +0100 12/12/01, Reinhard Mueller wrote:
> Neil Tiffin wrote:
> > At 12:06 PM -0600 12/11/01, Derek Neighbors wrote:
> >
> > > ** note on things like relationship/status etc... It might be better
> > > to list them after the class that uses them, because I thought wtf
> > > are these sitting out here all alone for, until I saw them
> > > referenced in another class.  That or make better comments for them.
> > > :)
> >
> > The original parser required them first.  I believe Reinhard's new 
> > parser eliminates the need to have them first.  If so, we will move
> > them.
>
> It does not eliminate the need for correct order. Before you can 
> reference something, you have to define what it is.

I was in the processing of removing this from the old parser, I hope 
we can do the same for the new parser.  I have some circular 
references where it is impossible to do this for references and 
lists.  See the HR gcd for an example.

--
Neil
address@hidden
GNU Enterprise
http://www.gnuenterprise.org/
http://www.gnuenterprise.org/~neilt/sc.html