[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [gnugo-devel] Re: Stack over-run
From: |
Gunnar Farneback |
Subject: |
Re: [gnugo-devel] Re: Stack over-run |
Date: |
Sun, 17 Feb 2002 11:24:21 +0100 |
User-agent: |
EMH/1.14.1 SEMI/1.14.3 (Ushinoya) FLIM/1.14.2 (Yagi-Nishiguchi) APEL/10.3 Emacs/20.7 (sparc-sun-solaris2.7) (with unibyte mode) |
Trevor wrote:
> Unfortunately, this idiom doesn't work for the TRACE family.
> The variable argument list can't be passed in. That is, there
> is no way to put the "} while (0)" part after the argument
> list (unless you have variadic macros).
Right, I forgot about the limitations in this context. The solution
+#define TRACE (verbose) && gprintf
in your patch looks good enough.
/Gunnar
- [gnugo-devel] Re: Stack over-run, Trevor Morris, 2002/02/14
- Re: [gnugo-devel] Re: Stack over-run, Daniel Bump, 2002/02/14
- Re: [gnugo-devel] Re: Stack over-run, Daniel Bump, 2002/02/16
- Re: [gnugo-devel] Re: Stack over-run, Trevor Morris, 2002/02/16
- Re: [gnugo-devel] Re: Stack over-run, Daniel Bump, 2002/02/16
- Re: [gnugo-devel] Re: Stack over-run, Gunnar Farneback, 2002/02/16
- Re: [gnugo-devel] Re: Stack over-run, Trevor Morris, 2002/02/16
- Re: [gnugo-devel] Re: Stack over-run,
Gunnar Farneback <=
- Re: [gnugo-devel] Re: Stack over-run, Daniel Bump, 2002/02/19
- Re: [gnugo-devel] Re: Stack over-run, Dave Denholm, 2002/02/19
- Re: [gnugo-devel] Re: Stack over-run, Daniel Bump, 2002/02/19