[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [gnugo-devel] Threads
From: |
Trevor Morris |
Subject: |
Re: [gnugo-devel] Threads |
Date: |
Thu, 07 Nov 2002 11:55:15 -0500 |
At 05:39 PM 11/7/2002 +0100, Heikki Levanto wrote:
>On Thu, Nov 07, 2002 at 09:56:05PM +0000, Andrew Derrick Balsa wrote:
>> However, GNU Go is much more complicated and much larger than Randyplus.
>> Adding threads would be a non-trivial task. It may be worth it, though.
>
>I think this sounds backwards. Using threads is a solution. Unless someone
>clearly explains me the problem we are trying to solve with threads, I see
>no reason to add them "just in case" they "may be worth it".
There are two ideas that prompted me to pose the question:
1) Dan's experiments w/ spawning other GNU Go processes. Perhaps this
work could also be done by a thread.
2) Thinking on opponent's time. It would be awfully nice to be able to have
GNU Go filling its cache and pondering the opponent's possbile next move
while waiting for it. Seems like this would give an improvement in playing
speed of less than 2x, but perhaps 1.5x or so.
-Trevor
- Re: [gnugo-devel] GNU Go as an oracle, (continued)
- Re: [gnugo-devel] GNU Go as an oracle, bump, 2002/11/07
- Re: [gnugo-devel] GNU Go as an oracle, Trevor Morris, 2002/11/06
- Re: [gnugo-devel] GNU Go as an oracle, Arend Bayer, 2002/11/07
- Re: [gnugo-devel] GNU Go as an oracle, Dave Denholm, 2002/11/07
- Re: [gnugo-devel] GNU Go as an oracle, Andrew Derrick Balsa, 2002/11/07
- Re: [gnugo-devel] GNU Go as an oracle, Dave Denholm, 2002/11/07
- Re: [gnugo-devel] GNU Go as an oracle, Andrew Derrick Balsa, 2002/11/15
- Re: [gnugo-devel] GNU Go as an oracle, Dave Denholm, 2002/11/15
- Re: [gnugo-devel] GNU Go as an oracle, Andrew Derrick Balsa, 2002/11/07
- [gnugo-devel] Threads, Heikki Levanto, 2002/11/07
- Re: [gnugo-devel] Threads,
Trevor Morris <=
- Re: [gnugo-devel] Threads, Andrew Derrick Balsa, 2002/11/07