Re: [gnugo-devel] attack5

[bump]

> This probably needs a lot more analysis before putting it in CVS.  I'm
> unsure of whether it's a good idea to put it in without defend5.  Clearly,
> defend5 is needed before more sophisticated attacks can be tried in
> attack5.

We probably don't want to do this. The tactical reading assumes that
a string with 5 liberties is alive, and if it has more than 5 liberties
attacking it is an issue for the owl code.

Dan