Victor Engmark wrote:
> <!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.1//EN" "
> http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml11/DTD/xhtml11.dtd">
> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xml:lang="en">
As you did not reply to the [1] email, I thought you had agreed about
using "HTML
4.01 Strict" instead of "XHTML 1.x ..".
[1] http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/gnuherds-app-dev/2007-03/msg00040.html
If you do not agree, let us know your rationale.
I'm not trying to undermine your decision (although you have my rationale); you can cut'n'paste just about anything XHTML into a HTML document and it'll still be valid. It's probably less risky to "back-port" my markup than making me work in HTML 4 (I haven't used it since 2002 or something).
> Notes:
>
> - No more @target - It's only necessary when using frames.
It is true GNU Herds does not use frames. However, we added @target to <a> to
avoid others sites to embed GNU Herds into one of _their_ frames.
Is that likely? I've not seen such a site for... I think a couple years. If they're that keen on stealing our search status, they're sure to be able to remove the @targets. It's quite a few bytes extra, in the aggregate.