[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Disabling inline in mframe.m
From: |
Nicola Pero |
Subject: |
Re: Disabling inline in mframe.m |
Date: |
Wed, 6 Jun 2001 05:46:35 +0200 (CEST) |
I forgot to say that inline nested functions are not essential - while we
can't live without a working Objective-C compiler, or nested functions
returning a variable size struct <because that would prevent us from
implementing some functionality>, we can live without inline nested
functions <because that only gives us a tiny performance penalty>.
> > GCC 3.0 has still problems with inline nested functions, but I'm not
> > sure
> > that that will be fixed (btw, official GCC 3.0 release is now scheduled
> > in
> > less than a month).
> >
> > Could you send a bug report to address@hidden and cc me?
- Re: Disabling inline in mframe.m, (continued)
- Re: Disabling inline in mframe.m, Nicola Pero, 2001/06/05
- Re: Disabling inline in mframe.m, Nicola Pero, 2001/06/05
- Re: Disabling inline in mframe.m, Nicola Pero, 2001/06/05
- how essential is ffcall ?, Robert E. Hartley, 2001/06/05
- Re: how essential is ffcall ?, Robert E. Hartley, 2001/06/05
- Re: how essential is ffcall ?, Adam Fedor, 2001/06/05
- Re: how essential is ffcall ?, Dennis Leeuw, 2001/06/08
- Re: how essential is ffcall ?, Adam Fedor, 2001/06/08
Re: Disabling inline in mframe.m, Richard Stallman, 2001/06/05