[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Disabling inline in mframe.m
|
From: |
Richard Stallman |
|
Subject: |
Re: Disabling inline in mframe.m |
|
Date: |
Wed, 6 Jun 2001 13:05:10 -0600 (MDT) |
I forgot to say that inline nested functions are not essential
I am glad you forgot. Please don't say to the maintainer of another
GNU package, "Fixing that bug is not essential for us, you don't have
to fix it." A documented feature is supposed to work. If it doesn't,
it should be fixed--regardless of whether any specific package is
screwed by it.
Thanks.
- Re: Disabling inline in mframe.m, (continued)
- Re: Disabling inline in mframe.m, Nicola Pero, 2001/06/05
- Re: Disabling inline in mframe.m, Nicola Pero, 2001/06/05
- how essential is ffcall ?, Robert E. Hartley, 2001/06/05
- Re: how essential is ffcall ?, Robert E. Hartley, 2001/06/05
- Re: how essential is ffcall ?, Adam Fedor, 2001/06/05
- Re: how essential is ffcall ?, Dennis Leeuw, 2001/06/08
- Re: how essential is ffcall ?, Adam Fedor, 2001/06/08
Re: Disabling inline in mframe.m, Richard Stallman, 2001/06/05