[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: ABI breakage in 2.10.4 --> 2.11.6?
From: |
Werner Koch |
Subject: |
Re: ABI breakage in 2.10.4 --> 2.11.6? |
Date: |
Fri, 18 Feb 2011 19:31:45 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) |
On Thu, 17 Feb 2011 23:13, address@hidden said:
> That part of the API concerns gnutls internals thus it is always
> under revision. However it will not cause any crashes since it relies
> on GNUTLS_CRYPTO_API_VERSION number to detect the version of the
> structures supplied. The catch is that applications that replace
Okay, but in this case you should make it clear that
gnutls_crypto_mac_register2 and gnutls_crypto_digest_register2 are
private functions; for example by prefixing them with an underscore.
Salam-Shalom,
Werner
--
Die Gedanken sind frei. Ausnahmen regelt ein Bundesgesetz.
- Re: ABI breakage in 2.10.4 --> 2.11.6?, (continued)
- Re: ABI breakage in 2.10.4 --> 2.11.6?, Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos, 2011/02/17
- Re: ABI breakage in 2.10.4 --> 2.11.6?, Andreas Metzler, 2011/02/18
- Re: ABI breakage in 2.10.4 --> 2.11.6?, Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos, 2011/02/19
- Re: ABI breakage in 2.10.4 --> 2.11.6?, Werner Koch, 2011/02/19
- Re: ABI breakage in 2.10.4 --> 2.11.6?, Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos, 2011/02/19
- Re: ABI breakage in 2.10.4 --> 2.11.6?, Simon Josefsson, 2011/02/19
- Re: ABI breakage in 2.10.4 --> 2.11.6?, Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos, 2011/02/19
- Re: ABI breakage in 2.10.4 --> 2.11.6?, Werner Koch, 2011/02/20
- Re: ABI breakage in 2.10.4 --> 2.11.6?, Simon Josefsson, 2011/02/21
- Re: ABI breakage in 2.10.4 --> 2.11.6?, Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos, 2011/02/21
Re: ABI breakage in 2.10.4 --> 2.11.6?,
Werner Koch <=