[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: ABI breakage in 2.10.4 --> 2.11.6?
From: |
Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos |
Subject: |
Re: ABI breakage in 2.10.4 --> 2.11.6? |
Date: |
Sat, 19 Feb 2011 10:14:30 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101208 Thunderbird/3.1.7 |
On 02/18/2011 06:10 PM, Andreas Metzler wrote:
> On 2011-02-17 Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos <address@hidden> wrote:
>> On 02/17/2011 08:00 PM, Andreas Metzler wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> I think the the ABI in 2.11.6 was changed relative to 2.10.
>>> Considering the recent discussion on list I guess this was not done
>>> intentionally.
>
>> That part of the API concerns gnutls internals thus it is always
>> under revision.
> [...]
> Stupid question: If it is about internals why is it part of the
> published API/ABI?
That's a nice question. This API is mostly interesting to people
who are porting gnutls to another crypto library. We might
exported via another header in gnutls-3.0.0.
regards,
Nikos
- ABI breakage in 2.10.4 --> 2.11.6?, Andreas Metzler, 2011/02/17
- Re: ABI breakage in 2.10.4 --> 2.11.6?, Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos, 2011/02/17
- Re: ABI breakage in 2.10.4 --> 2.11.6?, Andreas Metzler, 2011/02/18
- Re: ABI breakage in 2.10.4 --> 2.11.6?,
Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos <=
- Re: ABI breakage in 2.10.4 --> 2.11.6?, Werner Koch, 2011/02/19
- Re: ABI breakage in 2.10.4 --> 2.11.6?, Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos, 2011/02/19
- Re: ABI breakage in 2.10.4 --> 2.11.6?, Simon Josefsson, 2011/02/19
- Re: ABI breakage in 2.10.4 --> 2.11.6?, Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos, 2011/02/19
- Re: ABI breakage in 2.10.4 --> 2.11.6?, Werner Koch, 2011/02/20
- Re: ABI breakage in 2.10.4 --> 2.11.6?, Simon Josefsson, 2011/02/21
- Re: ABI breakage in 2.10.4 --> 2.11.6?, Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos, 2011/02/21
Re: ABI breakage in 2.10.4 --> 2.11.6?, Werner Koch, 2011/02/18