gomp-discuss
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Gomp-discuss] Question about libgomp ..


From: Lars Segerlund
Subject: Re: [Gomp-discuss] Question about libgomp ..
Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2003 15:13:11 +0100
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i586; en-US; rv:1.2.1) Gecko/20021226 Debian/1.2.1-9


Ok I give up :-) .... I just thought that it would be possible to generate direct calls to the threading library we will use.

 Sometimes you get GREAT ideas :-) ....

 / Lars Segerlund.

Biagio Lucini wrote:
On Wed, 29 Jan 2003, Lars Segerlund wrote:


 I have some thoughts about libgomp, mainly is libgomp really necessary ?

If we generate calls to the thread library in use ( or syscalls for those systems supporting threads ) this might not be necessary.



A library is for sure necessary, since it is in the specifications of
OpenMP. Now the point is whether you want to stick with the specifications
and implement just the needed functions, or do things the Intel way and
add an extra layer of functions between the OpenMP code and the threading.
I would prefere the second one, because it allows to keep the OpenMP part
as separate as possible from the rest.

Biagio



_______________________________________________
Gomp-discuss mailing list
address@hidden
http://mail.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gomp-discuss






reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]