Re: [Gomp-discuss] Plan ... coments wanted !

[Pop Sébastian]

On Fri, Jan 31, 2003 at 01:08:53AM +0100, Steven Bosscher wrote:
> > The following is just science fiction :-)
> > <SF>
> >   Why I still want to keep OMP lowering before tree optimizations is 
> > because we 
> >   could run a concurency detection pass (specific to a well known lib 
> > interface)
> >   that will build the specific tree nodes needed by the optimizer.
> >   (In fact this pass will promote lib calls to tree nodes with concurency 
> > semantics.)
> >   This way we could optimize not only OMP code, but also code written using 
> > this 
> >   library...  But as usual this will require some more work on the compiler 
> > side, 
> >   and simplify a little the work for GOMP.
> > </SF>
> > 
> 
> Ehh???  What lib interface? Can you explain this some more please?
> 

I didn't specify the lib name since it is not important: 
every lib has a set of functions with a given semantics.  
If we make the compiler aware of this semantic, then we 
can optimize a code written with calls to this lib.  

Sorry for noise and for this off topic.