[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [patch] subordinate SMOBs with GOOPS superclasses
From: |
Klaus Schilling |
Subject: |
Re: [patch] subordinate SMOBs with GOOPS superclasses |
Date: |
Tue, 11 Dec 2007 17:36:08 +0100 (CET) |
From: address@hidden (Ludovic Courtès)
Subject: Re: [patch] subordinate SMOBs with GOOPS superclasses
Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2007 16:02:37 +0100
> Hi Andreas,
>
> Andreas Rottmann <address@hidden> writes:
>
> > You should probably also have a look at the Scheme-Level FFI of PLT
> > Scheme[1], and my reimplementation for Scheme 48[2].
>
> Thanks for the links, that's the kind of think I had in mind. Perhaps
> you'd like to port S42 to Guile as well? :-)
>
> BTW, there's one small potential issue with the dynamic construction of
> function calls like this: it's almost impossible to catch API/ABI
> inconsistencies beforehand.
this makes the whole FFI stuff absurd.
There's absolutely no alternative to an elaborate C API
as guile's, and hand-written library wrappers.
Klaus Schilling
- Re: [patch] subordinate SMOBs with GOOPS superclasses, Andy Wingo, 2007/12/05
- Re: [patch] subordinate SMOBs with GOOPS superclasses, Ludovic Courtès, 2007/12/09
- Re: [patch] subordinate SMOBs with GOOPS superclasses, Andreas Rottmann, 2007/12/09
- Re: [patch] subordinate SMOBs with GOOPS superclasses, Ludovic Courtès, 2007/12/11
- Re: [patch] subordinate SMOBs with GOOPS superclasses,
Klaus Schilling <=
- Re: [patch] subordinate SMOBs with GOOPS superclasses, Neil Jerram, 2007/12/12
- Re: [patch] subordinate SMOBs with GOOPS superclasses, Clinton Ebadi, 2007/12/12
- Re: [patch] subordinate SMOBs with GOOPS superclasses, Klaus Schilling, 2007/12/13
- Re: [patch] subordinate SMOBs with GOOPS superclasses, Ludovic Courtès, 2007/12/13
- Re: [patch] subordinate SMOBs with GOOPS superclasses, Ludovic Courtès, 2007/12/13